Ebola Sends: PhotoShop Can Take Years Off Your Face, Inches Off a Super Model
…and put thousands of teeny, teeny, tiny little Occupiers on a Google Map shot where there weren’t any before.
Ooopsie.
Note to rage-against-the-machine/banks/waterflouridation types: Other people know it can do that, too.
Nanny State, People, Planet Ebola, Politics | tree hugging sister | 
October 9, 2011 2:33 pm
Subscribe
Lies indeed. Losers they are, one and all.
Oopsie indeed!
And in fairness, it may be that the originator of theP hotoshop is, ummmmm, “innocent” of deliberately misleading people:
“……the origins of the image itself. The original photoshopped image was produced by digital artist Scott Lickstein, who intended it to represent a “virtual 99% turnout”, ie what the OWS protests would look like if all of the people supporting the movement online could turn up at the protests in person (thanks Terrance for the info). Whilst Lickstein’s other work certainly has a political bent to it, this piece was never intended to mislead people into believing it to be a real image. I mention this because it appears that Lickstein has had accusations levelled at him of deliberately faking the image to misinform the public and/or discredit the movement. To the best of my knowledge this is not the case.”
Perhaps, but it’s not as though the left has actually Photoshop to deceive people. I tend to believe that the original digital artist was sufficiently naive that he could, and did intend to deceive people, And when caught, offered this rather lame excuse.
Of course, I don’t know whether or not this is true. I just feel that it represents 99% of the lefties supporting the #OccupyWallStreetCretins in a virtual sense.
The MSM have been doing a photoshop derivitive ever since this started with their camera angles making the audience believe that there are far more people.
Sorta the reverse of that Nevada Tea Party confab where CNN said there were dozens instead of the actual thousands.
Things are getting serious – this is media manipulation on a very large scale. Is the objective to get us to think the media is untrustworthy? And surely Soros, who is funding via proxies, a lot of this stuff, can be brought to account for his treachery?