Change You Can Believe In!
Via Insta here is the Number One reason why there needs to be a complete housecleaning in Washington
DOJ to America: we won’t reveal the circumstances under which you can be assassinated by us
Read the list, and weep.
And no, it won’t be accomplished by Ron Paul. I swear his campaign is being secretly funded by Soros to make every slur against conservatives seems a reality; he is the Left’s ideal Republican candidate. The current list of GOP candidates is frankly not very inspiring but any of them (except Grandpa Simpson) would be an improvement over Obama but the real key is getting control of the Senate.
Morality, Nanny State, Politics | Mr. Bingley | 
December 23, 2011 8:33 am
Subscribe
I have this ugly feeling that we are already a Third World country. The economics just haven’t hit home yet.
Can you imagine if a Republican administration said this? You would think the lefties would be screaming but nooooo. BTW, Ron Paul is nuts, just sayin’.
“nuts” is putting it extremely mildly, md.
Ron Paul would have to be treated with much of the psychoactive pharmaceutical armamentarium to be considered just ‘nuts’.
Yeah, insane doesn’t cover it with Ron Paul. He’s cockeyed all right, but at a high-functioning level. His illogic is carried out to some dire and poisonous conclusions. I’d rather write in the Ghost of Warren Harding than vote for him.
Yea, but if he goes third party he has enough true believing Paulbots that will follow him into an Obama second term.
Stand by when Ebola sees this. There’ll be incoming for sure…
Hmm…
That was supposed to be “yes” or even “yeah” but not “yea”.
Competely different meaning, I’m thinking.
It’s legal. Congress made sure of that when they passed PL107-40. The only irony to this whole thing is that the singular document that limits the use of 107-40 against US citizens and legal aliens is in fact NDAA. Which the jackasses in tinfoil hats and McCain are trying to say open the door for open use of gov’t force against individual citizens. 107-40 has been in place since Sept 18, 2001 as follows:
“(a) IN GENERAL.—That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.”
Both the Obama and Bush administrations correctly argue that, “…in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.” allows the carte blanche where this is concerned. The irony still boggles my mind. Stupid ass Paul bots and citizens that want to play-act at being informed to forward their own agendas.
That’s my boy… Why waste letters or fancy terms for Ron Paul? Nuts is short, sweet, succinct and the guy is just plain Mayor of Crazy Town nuts.
Meanwhile, its started, or probably just continues.
The “Justice” Department has rejected the South Carolina Voter ID law.
Merry Christmas ACORN.
Ron Paul is the high priest of a very scary cult. It’s scary because, as everyone here notes, Ron Paul is nuts. On a good day.
But be careful of dissing Da Man; last night I met a co-worker at the store, with his wife (whom I never met before).
In the course of the conversation, he asked if I was still in the TEA Party. I said “Yes”, whereupon he mentioned that his youngest son is a Ron Paul supporter.
Now, I’ve known this guy a long time. He’s a retired Guard officer with considerable intelligence experience behind, stuff that he can only describe in very general terms. I understand enough of that shtick to know.
So he never struck me as the follower of Ron Paul. His son would be a different matter. But I never thought about his wife before I said, “Oh, a Ronulan, huh?”
Bad move. I got the stink eye of death, and the conversation was over quickly.
Like I said — a cult.
Argument I had with a highschool friend the other day led to him blocking me. I mentioned the fact that Ron Paul intends to use Executive powers to remove ALL troops from overseas. He said that Paul had never said it, so I linked the video in which is said plain as day and then explained his reasoning. That earned me getting blocked and called an Imperialist Warmongerer because I made the point that the reason our trade shipping is safe is because the military protects the god damn routes and can respond. No bases equates to alot of pissed off countries and likely no access to a majority of ports much less supply for US military ships. Negating the point of Paul’s imaginary “submarine shield” especially in the event of a conventional warfare scenerio.