Obama Probably Expected to Get an Ass Reaming for That Miserable West Point P-Word Pablum
…from the WaPo.
Edit pages pan Obama speech
The New York Times editorial board, often supportive of the White House, wrote that his “address did not match the hype, was largely uninspiring, lacked strategic sweep and is unlikely to quiet his detractors, on the right or the left.”
…The Wall Street Journal, far more accustomed to criticizing the president on foreign policy, said Obama’s speech was marked less by what he said and more by what he left out —…
…The Washington Post editorial said the president’s “binding of U.S. power places Mr. Obama at odds with every U.S. president since World War II.”
“President Obama has retrenched U.S. global engagement in a way that has shaken the confidence of many U.S. allies and encouraged some adversaries,” the board said, attacking the president for resorting to rhetoric instead of adjusting policy.
Military Thingies, Nanny State, People, Politics, World Stuff | tree hugging sister | 
May 29, 2014 9:37 am
Subscribe
Not to worry. Like with all foreign policy problems, we can count on Obama to either pivot to it, focus like a laser, make it his top priority or think of it when he first wakes up? Make no mistake.
Its like having a community organizer running the country.
Correct, Syd. But first he will get madder than hell.
Does this mean the oceans are finally receding?