For When You Absolutely, Positively
…have to go through that TSA scanner.
4TH AMENDMENT UNDERCLOTHES
4th Amendment Metallic ink-printed undershirts and underwear.
Assert your rights without saying a word.
Freaking GENIUS.
The kids’ boxers are (AiYEE!!) caustic.
God bless the American entrepreneur.
Biz, Nanny State, Politics | tree hugging sister | 
November 30, 2010 7:33 pm
Subscribe
I’ll buy one for my upcoming flights.
And just because.
Brilliance like this makes me have faith that America will continue to thrive. Seriously, this is awesome.
Maybe if I wear that, it will piss them off enough that I can finally get the full body search I so desperately crave…
I remember those TSA newbies when they were fresh out of McDonalds nervous and not a little scared, how they’ve grown.
Yeah, I saw those yesterday. I am very close to buying some but I’d like to be sure that they work in the naked viewer. Their pictures show xrays, not the naked viewing machine.
They should work, Skyler. An x-ray machine uses a stronger radiation source than the airport scanners. One article noted “…it would take 5,000 scans to equal the radiation dose from a single X-ray. ” Logic indicates that the scanners should pick up the metallic lettering easily.
But I see your point. X-rays work by going through the body to expose a film. Scanners work by backscatter radiation or (and I wasn’t aware of this until I Binged it) by millimeter frequency wave (“radio”) reflection.
The lettering on the underclothing *could* send back a stronger signal than flesh would, and thus be readable. Alternately, the backscatter/reflected signal might hit the letter from the back, possibly resulting in random “noise”.
Hard to say which way. Only testing will show that.
That would so get you anally probed by the fuckers.
Then someone needs to market a 4th Amendment Bunghole Cover.
Now I know what I’m getting everyone for Christmas.
Now, the bra has the TSA emblem for nipple covers, ricki! I thought that was a particularly clever use of a circle…jerk.