Fort Dix Being Re-Named
To what, you ask. Fort Willy? Fort Naughty Bits? No! Now it will be…
…Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.
McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.
Does that make McGuire a sexual predator?
To what, you ask. Fort Willy? Fort Naughty Bits? No! Now it will be…
…Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.
McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.
Does that make McGuire a sexual predator?
Fun | Mr. Bingley | September 30, 2009 2:47 pm
The Coalition Of The Swilling is powered by WordPress
I have no attachment to these places, except that I know these are very famous bases with long histories. I’m sure there are good reasons to merge the bases, but this is ridiculous. This is a name only a committee could come up with.
That or some inner city family with addiction to hyphenation.
Now that you mention it, it does seem that by trying not to offend everybody, they came up with something kinda offensive. Whoops.
(And thanks to Ebola’s comment, I’m now worried that someday I will be teaching a kid saddled with that name!)
I demobed from the Army in 1983 at Fort Dix, but I was barely there 24 hours.
From the article, it’s just a consolidation of Army, Air Force, and Navy installations to (I suppose) save money. Hoo boy, I’d hate to be the base commander for there!
Fort Now Nobody’s Happy.
makes it easier for Teh Øne to shut down one big base, instead of three.
Very clever name, NOT. Oy!
Changes that whole famous Mel Brooks line, now.
“Fought drought, fought locusts, fought McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst!”
Loses something in the translation.
They should do what Fort Bragg/Pope AFB does, keep the separate names. I mean, Pope is located within Fort Bragg but they keep their individual identities. Oh well.
God how I wish I could think of something funny to say about this. McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Joint Base is just too arcane.