The Best Argument I’ve Heard Yet For Allowing Gay Marriage
We’ll get more stories like this
A bride was arrested at her own wedding party after baring her breasts at a doorman – and then hitting him over the head with her red stiletto shoe.
Sharon Hancox, 40, spent her first night of marriage in police cells after the row at the champagne reception for her lesbian wedding to her new wife.
A court heard Hancox had drunk up to eight pints of lager and champagne at the party after their gay civil ceremony.
As an interesting legal defense, I wonder if she could have said that, as the other woman was the wife she was therefore the husband, and as it is not illegal for the “husband” to expose “his” breasts in public no crime therefore occurred.
Well, no crime apart from the two-inch-spiked-stiletto-heel-to-the-forehead bit, but some guys like that sort of stuff.
Fun | Mr. Bingley | 
March 23, 2010 7:41 am
Subscribe
Unfortunate that there’s no photo.
Somebody had to have a video camera…
And this is different from any given episode of “Bridezillas” how?
(Maybe that’s the real lesson: everyone’s an idiot, deep down, whether they’re gay or straight.)
Baring one’s breasts is constitutionally protected here in Texas. It’s a good thing.
No, I’m not kidding, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that way many years ago. Strangely, we haven’t had armies of crazy topless women rampaging throughout the cities of Texas since then. What a shame. But if you take your boat to Devil’s Cove on Lake Travis, there are plenty of sights to see!
When and where did she down all those brews (must have been one helluva ceremony)? What was the “wife” doing during all this? Where’s the Bravo reality show contract?
A court heard Hancox had drunk up to eight pints of lager and champagne at the party after their gay civil ceremony.
Hmm. Doesn’t sound it to me.
Should an engaged couple be frank and earnest, or should one of them be a girl?
That used to be a vulgar nightclub joke, now itseems to be the law of the land. Good thing our social order is so well established and stable that a little thing like destroying the nuclear family won’t make any difference. I mean destroying the black family (as Pat Moynihan warned about in 1965) didn’t make any difference to the welfare of black people, did it? (/sarc)
“Baring one’s breasts is constitutionally protected here in Texas. It’s a good thing.”
Oddly, in California, it’s okay as long as nobody gets turned on (“lascivious conduct” or something like that). This led to an amusing (to me) story in which some “feminists” tried to get arrested for protesting by baring their boobs, some 20 or so years ago. But they were terribly unattractive, so they didn’t get arrested.