“Snakes. Why’d It Have to Be Snakes?”
You get what you lie down with, as evidenced in our Quote of the Day from “No More Bonhomie for Bubba and Barry?“:
…Honestly, between this and Joe Biden’s insistence Thursday night that the intelligence community is also partly to blame for the Benghazi fiasco, it appears that the Obama administration has a death wish. Tangling with one set of venomous snakes is crazy enough — but two?
Hissssssss…..and a smile.
Humanity...or the Lack Thereof, Nanny State, People, Politics, World Stuff | tree hugging sister | 
October 13, 2012 3:18 pm
Subscribe
Not really venomous on both, I’d say spitting cobra (taking on the Clintons) and python (ambushing strangler – taking on the intel community). Both deadly – just in different ways.
I love snakes. They eat bugs and other vermin. 🙂
And they’re no PC, they’d eat us if we were small enough – and some of them will kill us if we get in their way. (And I’ve had to get out of the way a few times in my life.) But I admire that. ( probably why I tend libertarian…:-P )
If Obama’s taking on the Clintons, he’s nuts. Their political/survival skills far outweigh his.
Kathy, they’re all a bunch of bloody vipers. If they’d just spend their time poisoning each other, leaving everyone else to live their lives, it wouldn’t be so bad.
Thanks, Kathy Kinsley. We Sistrurus have to eat, and protect our young uns.
@aelfheld – generally, snakes are happy to leave others alone. Unless they get disturbed. Don’t bug ’em/step on them/invade their territory (oh, but you have to figure out how not to do that) and you’re quite safe.
They are a lot like me. Probably why I like ’em. 😀