“Snakes. Why’d It Have to Be Snakes?”

You get what you lie down with, as evidenced in our Quote of the Day from “No More Bonhomie for Bubba and Barry?“:

…Honestly, between this and Joe Biden’s insistence Thursday night that the intelligence community is also partly to blame for the Benghazi fiasco, it appears that the Obama administration has a death wish. Tangling with one set of venomous snakes is crazy enough — but two?

Hissssssss…..and a smile.

5 Responses to ““Snakes. Why’d It Have to Be Snakes?””

  1. Kathy Kinsley says:

    Not really venomous on both, I’d say spitting cobra (taking on the Clintons) and python (ambushing strangler – taking on the intel community). Both deadly – just in different ways.

    I love snakes. They eat bugs and other vermin. 🙂

    And they’re no PC, they’d eat us if we were small enough – and some of them will kill us if we get in their way. (And I’ve had to get out of the way a few times in my life.) But I admire that. ( probably why I tend libertarian…:-P )

  2. Dr Alice says:

    If Obama’s taking on the Clintons, he’s nuts. Their political/survival skills far outweigh his.

  3. aelfheld says:

    Kathy, they’re all a bunch of bloody vipers. If they’d just spend their time poisoning each other, leaving everyone else to live their lives, it wouldn’t be so bad.

  4. pygmy rattler says:

    Thanks, Kathy Kinsley. We Sistrurus have to eat, and protect our young uns.

  5. Kathy Kinsley says:

    @aelfheld – generally, snakes are happy to leave others alone. Unless they get disturbed. Don’t bug ’em/step on them/invade their territory (oh, but you have to figure out how not to do that) and you’re quite safe.

    They are a lot like me. Probably why I like ’em. 😀

Image | WordPress Themes