Depends What Your Definition of “Desecration” Is

A comment on another blog considering the Marines tinkling on turbans got me pondering.

Didn’t the Commander-in-Chief himself condone and direct the desecration of Osama Bin Laden’s vile bones by consigning him to the briny deep, vice 6 feet under terra firma?

Well, didn’t he?

4 Responses to “Depends What Your Definition of “Desecration” Is”

  1. JeffS says:

    I agree. He did.

  2. Paco says:

    Isn’t this business with the Marines perhaps just a big misunderstanding, a case of something getting lost in translation? I’ve read a little in Islamic literature and history, and they’re always saying of some notable or other, “Peace be on him…”

  3. Yojimbo says:

    Couple that with the old hippie saying of “Peace Out” and you may be on to something. Just an unsuccessful attempt at hands reaching over the cultural divide. I feel better about this already.

    *reset button*

  4. Larry says:

    Strictly speaking, it’s a keffiyeh not a turban. The number of muslims that wear turbans is miniscule, a turban is more of a Sikh thing.
    The only problem I have with the video is…why inna hell do these idiots have video recording equipment on patrol??? Do they not understand OPSEC???

Image | WordPress Themes