RNC and NYT Agree! Harry Reid = Dirty Liar

…“As far as Harry Reid is concerned, listen, I know you might want to go down that road, I’m not going to respond to a dirty liar who hasn’t filed a single page of tax returns himself. Complains about people with money but lives in the Ritz Carlton here down the street,” Priebus said. “So if that’s on the agenda, I’m not going to go there. This is just a made-up issue. And the fact that we’re going to spend any time talking about it is ridiculous.”

HAH! Reince Priebus scorches Dirty Harry to Stephanopoulos. (And ABOUT DAMN TIME.)

Of course, Priebus SHOULD be going after the sleezey geezer tooth and nail, but!

When you’ve lost the Shady Grey Lady’s Frank Bruni, too?

Truculence Before Truth

FOR the dwindling few out there who still believe that big accusations require a little foundation and that truth — as opposed to conjecture — matters, here’s an update:

As last week drew to a close, Harry Reid, the Senate’s Democratic majority leader, had backed up his claim that Mitt Romney didn’t pay taxes for a 10-year period with absolutely nothing more than some vague reference to some unnamed guy who said something of the sort to Reid during some phone conversation some time ago.

That’s it. That’s all. But for Reid, it was enough not only to level his charge but also, as the days pressed on, to double and triple down on it, his language and manner growing more righteous even as his evidence grew no more detailed or persuasive.

The claim appeared first in an interview with The Huffington Post that went online Tuesday.

“Now, do I know that that’s true?” Reid said in the interview, which also included his mention of the phone call, supposedly from an investor in Bain Capital. “Well, I’m not certain.”

No biggie! Full steam ahead!…

…Reid was unbowed. Inconsistent, too. At one point he told reporters from his home state of Nevada that “a number of people” had whispered to him of Romney’s alleged tax evasion, while at a subsequent point he issued a statement citing only “an extremely credible source,” singular. In neither instance did he hang any flesh on these bones.

“I don’t think the burden should be on me,” said Reid, whose history of intemperate, borderline adolescent remarks was detailed in The Times by Michael D. Shear and Richard A. Oppel Jr. “The burden should be on him. He’s the one I’ve alleged has not paid any taxes.”

So if I just decide to allege that Reid levied that accusation under detailed and persistent instructions from the Obama campaign, the burden would be on him to provide all of his office’s e-mail and phone correspondence in order to contradict that?

This would only matter, of course, if I hadn’t heard that Dirty Harry Reid was a ZOMBIE PEDERAST! It explains how he can be so completely without morals, scruples or any sense of remorse at his despicable actions, or, in fact, how he hasn’t the brains to resist making these incredibly ignorant, unfounded, vile and libelous accusations to begin with.

I always thought he looked like a cadaver in motion.

Are the rumors true?

ths update: And BOOM! Filthy, dirty Harry Reid has lost Bob Schieffer as well:

Bob Schieffer Compares Harry Reid to Joe McCarthy

Did anyone else hear Ted Strickland was a pederast, too? I mean, he’s saying the EXACT SAME THING as Filthy Dirty Harry Reid! How strange, disturbing and peculiar is that?

Is it true?

3 Responses to “RNC and NYT Agree! Harry Reid = Dirty Liar”

  1. aelfheld says:

    Well, it’s been alleged that #HarryReidisaPederast and he’s yet to refute the allegation.

    The burden should be on him. He’s the one alleged to have had sex with children. And strangled them.

  2. JeffS says:

    #HarryReidisaPederast is what I’ve heard as well. I hate to think about how many victims and all the grieving families he’s left behind over the years.

    What a dirt bag. Supported by a party of dirt bags.

  3. Michael Lonie says:

    Here we have a wealthy man working in a regulated industry and Senator Bigmouth alleges that he paid no taxes. Does anyone think that the IRS would not have come down on such a man like a ton of steel ingots (bricks are not hard enough) if such a thing happened? Bigmouth said his “source” told him it went on for ten years. This smear has the plausibility of perpetual motion. Anybody who swallows this smear is a genuine, 24-carat, dyed-in-the-wool, idiotic rube.

    Sadly, there are those who will believe this smear, and the others that the Obama campaign and its consiglieri will advance between now and the election. Obama has nothing else to run on except race and ssmearing his opponent. In 2008 53 peercent of the voters proved themselves to be rubes. Those that did not vote for the pathetically unqualified Obama as rubes did so as racists.

Image | WordPress Themes