Lyin’ (?) Eyes
A Michigan woman who lost a small-claims case because she refused to remove her veil while testifying has been granted a new hearing, court officials said.
Ginnnah Muhammad, 42, will appear before the same judge who told her last October that she had to remove her niqab — a veil with only a small opening at the eyes — so he could gauge whether she was telling the truth.
When Muhammad refused, Judge Paul Paruk ordered her to pay a rental car company for damage to a vehicle she rented. Muhammad appealed his ruling.
Humanity...or the Lack Thereof | tree hugging sister | 
January 24, 2007 2:16 pm
Subscribe
Piss off the judge, then walk back into his courtroom.
Good plan.
You know, mojo ~ I’m really curious what the grounds of her successful appeal was?
The judge likes his head attached to his body, I reckon.