Sorry, But You’re Not “Polarizing”

You’re “pathetic.” A “parody.” A “joke”

Hillary Clinton, in an interview with a British newspaper this week, appeared to compare herself to wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill while responding to a question about being a polarizing figure.

“I’m sure they said that about Churchill between the wars, didn’t they?” she told The Guardian when asked if she should withdraw from public life to help heal divisions in the U.S., given her reputation.

The 2016 Democratic presidential nominee then immediately claimed she wasn’t actually comparing herself to Churchill, before going on to elaborate on the analogy.

Churchill went into the political wilderness between the two World Wars and during that time was a key voice criticizing then-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement toward Adolf Hitler. He would go on to become prime minister himself and help lead the Allies to victory in World War II.

The Guardian report notes that Clinton made the Churchill reference “a fraction too quickly for the line to sound spontaneous.”
Clinton continued: “I mean, I’m not comparing myself, but I’m just saying people said that, but he was right about Hitler, and a lot of people in England were wrong. And Churchill was a pain. He kept popping up all the time.”

I love the note from the Grauniad, it’s perfectly true. She has never done anything in her entire life that was spontaneous. Everything she does has been planned to move her up the power chain.

And she will never understand, and certainly never forgive, the peasants for rejecting her

3 Responses to “Sorry, But You’re Not “Polarizing””

  1. JeffS says:

    Billary’s reported tantrums and bursts of anger might be described as spontaneous. Otherwise, spot on.

    It’s interesting that the Grauniad commented on the “spontaneous comment” from Her Nastiness, especially considering the lead on their article:

    She has made peace with losing the election – but not with Donald Trump. Now she is fighting to undo the damage of the president’s child-separation policy – and has no time for debates over civility.

    That’s not a particularly objective statement, even for that leftwing fishwrap.

  2. Kathy Kinsley says:

    No – and not accurate either. “The President’s” is ambiguous. Wasn’t President Trump who put that in place.

  3. Syd says:

    Can you imagine if that lump became POTUS? A lifetime of thank you’s to Donald Trump is inadequate.

Image | WordPress Themes